Source discovery and organisation
Bring the sources together.
The planned workspace brings documents, disclosures and market context into a research collection defined by your question.
Geteridian PlatformUnder development
More context.
Less searching.
An AI-powered workspace for research that keeps its sources in view.
We’re developing a platform for clients to connect market information, examine emerging themes and build a clearer perspective across global markets.
Explore the product previewSample project
Research questionGlobal logistics
How are operators describing capacity investment?
A first perspective
AI-assisted draftThe sample documents point to different investment priorities: improvements to existing capacity, changes to a service network, and planning around regional demand.
Look past the shared sector label. Each source describes a different operating decision. A common definition is needed before comparing scale.
Keep intention distinct from outcome. Planning language does not confirm that a capacity change has been completed.
Open question
Which operating measures would make these disclosures comparable?
Product preview. Fictional sources and illustrative analysis.Explore the screens and select a citation.
The product direction
From information
to a research thread.
A single workspace built around the question you need to answer. The source, the context and the conclusion belong together.
Question-led market monitoring
Follow the research thread.
Connect relevant developments across markets. Keep the original source, publication context and revisions close to the theme you are studying.
Source-linked analysis and review
Build a brief with a backbone.
Use AI to assist with synthesis, then review the argument against its citations, scope and evidence gaps before sharing a conclusion.
The role of AI
AI assistance.
Analyst judgment.
The platform is being designed to help researchers work through information while keeping the basis for each conclusion open to review.
Our research principlesPlanned AI drafts link back to the evidence that informed them. Original wording and context remain available to the researcher.
Researchers can challenge a draft, examine another explanation and distinguish a reported event from its possible implications.
The intended workflow keeps missing information, differences between markets and unresolved questions beside the analysis.
Under development
A clear direction.
A platform in progress.
The screens show the intended research experience. Product features, data coverage and access arrangements are still being developed.
Research workflows and interface design.
Connecting source collections, question-led monitoring and a reviewable research brief.
Data quality and research usefulness.
Assessing source access, citation handling and how AI-assisted output stands up to human review.
Details to be announced.
Interested in the platform? Share your workflow and the research questions you would want it to support.
Help shape the workspace
What would make your
research more useful?
Tell us where your current workflow slows down, which sources matter, and what a good research handoff looks like.
Discuss the platform